Current:Home > MyFederal judge temporarily blocks Biden administration rule to limit flaring of gas at oil wells -WealthPro Academy
Federal judge temporarily blocks Biden administration rule to limit flaring of gas at oil wells
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:00:03
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge in North Dakota has temporarily blocked a new Biden administration rule aimed at reducing the venting and flaring of natural gas at oil wells.
“At this preliminary stage, the plaintiffs have shown they are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim the 2024 Rule is arbitrary and capricious,” U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor ruled Friday, the Bismarck Tribune reported.
North Dakota, along with Montana, Texas, Wyoming and Utah, challenged the rule in federal court earlier this year, arguing that it would hinder oil and gas production and that the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management is overstepping its regulatory authority on non-federal minerals and air pollution.
The bureau says the rule is intended to reduce the waste of gas and that royalty owners would see over $50 million in additional payments if it was enforced.
But Traynor wrote that the rules “add nothing more than a layer of federal regulation on top of existing federal regulation.”
When pumping for oil, natural gas often comes up as a byproduct. Gas isn’t as profitable as oil, so it is vented or flared unless the right equipment is in place to capture.
Methane, the main component of natural gas, is a climate “super pollutant” that is many times more potent in the short term than carbon dioxide.
Well operators have reduced flaring rates in North Dakota significantly over the past few years, but they still hover around 5%, the Tribune reported. Reductions require infrastructure to capture, transport and use that gas.
North Dakota politicians praised the ruling.
“The Biden-Harris administration continuously attempts to overregulate and ultimately debilitate North Dakota’s energy production capabilities,” state Attorney General Drew Wrigley said in a statement.
The Bureau of Land Management declined comment.
veryGood! (354)
Related
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Ranking
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion