Current:Home > ScamsWendy Williams' guardian tried to block doc to avoid criticism, A&E alleges -WealthPro Academy
Wendy Williams' guardian tried to block doc to avoid criticism, A&E alleges
View
Date:2025-04-20 08:30:00
A&E Television Networks pushed back against Wendy Williams' temporary guardian in court last month, arguing she moved to block "Where Is Wendy Williams?" from airing to "silence" criticism, according to newly unsealed documents.
Sabrina Morrissey, Williams' temporary guardian, filed a lawsuit against A&E in New York County Supreme Court in February, seeking to stop Lifetime's documentary "Where Is Wendy Williams?" from airing. But in court documents that were recently unsealed and obtained by USA TODAY, Rachel Strom, an attorney for A&E Networks, argued Morrissey tried to shut down the documentary only after seeing the way Williams' guardianship was depicted in the trailer.
"Only after seeing the documentary's trailer and realizing her role in Ms. (Williams') life may be criticized did Ms. Morrissey enlist the courts to unconstitutionally silence that criticism," the filing alleged.
USA TODAY has reached out to an attorney for Morrissey for comment.
In a complaint unsealed earlier this month, Morrissey sought a restraining order against the network, alleging that Williams, who in February announced she was diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia, "was not, and is not, capable of consenting to the terms" of the contract for the documentary.
'Where Is Wendy Williams?':The biggest bombshells from Lifetime's documentary
Williams "did not, and could not, approve the manner in which she was filmed and portrayed in the trailer and documentary," the suit said, alleging the documentary "exploits (Williams') medical condition to portray her in a humiliating, degrading manner and in a false light." The filing also stated that Morrissey was "horrified by the release of the trailer and its contents, which falsely depict (Williams') behavior and demeanor as being the result of intoxication rather than the result of her medical condition."
In its filing, though, A&E's attorney argued Morrissey "took no measures to prevent the documentary's release until she saw the trailer, in which she and the guardianship system appear in a negative light," which "demonstrates that her purpose in seeking this prior restraint is simply to shut down public expression that she does not like."
Wendy Williams'lacked capacity' when she agreed to film Lifetime doc, unsealed filings say
The filing also stated that if Morrissey was "so worried" about Williams being filmed for the documentary, she had "months and months" to intervene. The fact that she did not do so, and "did nothing for nearly a year," is "contrary to the supposed need for emergency relief," A&E argued.
Lifetime, which is owned by A&E Networks, proceeded with airing "Where Is Wendy Williams?" on Feb. 24 and Feb. 25 after an appellate judge said blocking it from airing would be an "impermissible prior restraint on speech" in violation of the First Amendment.
Williams was placed under a financial guardianship in 2022 after Wells Fargo alleged she was "incapacitated." Throughout the Lifetime documentary, Williams' family was critical of the guardianship system, arguing her court-appointed guardian is not taking good care of her and that a family member should serve in that role.
Contributing: KiMi Robinson and Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY
veryGood! (22456)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Candace Cameron Bure Reacts to Claims That She Lied About Not Eating Fast Food for 20 Years
- North Dakota governor signs law limiting trans health care
- This shade of gray can add $2,500 to the value of your home
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Why Nick Jonas’ Performance With Kelsea Ballerini Caused Him to Go to Therapy
- This GOP member is urging for action on gun control and abortion rights
- ESPN's Shaka Hislop recovering after collapsing on air before Real Madrid-AC Milan match
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Why Nick Jonas’ Performance With Kelsea Ballerini Caused Him to Go to Therapy
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Fishing crew denied $3.5 million prize after their 619-pound marlin is bitten by a shark
- Australia Cuts Outlook for Great Barrier Reef to ‘Very Poor’ for First Time, Citing Climate Change
- Florida's abortion laws protect a pregnant person's life, but not for mental health
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Paris Hilton Mourns Death of “Little Angel” Dog Harajuku Bitch
- Dorian One of Strongest, Longest-Lasting Hurricanes on Record in the Atlantic
- Minnesota to join at least 4 other states in protecting transgender care this year
Recommendation
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Another Pipeline Blocked for Failure to Consider Climate Emissions
Climate Crisis Town Hall Tested Candidates’ Boldness and Credibility
Supreme Court extends freeze on changes to abortion pill access until Friday
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
Court Orders New Climate Impact Analysis for 4 Gigantic Coal Leases
Court Rejects Pipeline Rubber-Stamp, Orders Climate Impact Review
How do you get equal health care for all? A huge new database holds clues